Triple
T24109890
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leonard McCoy |
E597338
|
entity |
| Predicate | relativeTypeTo Joanna McCoy |
P155097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | father |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: father | Statement: [Leonard McCoy, relativeTypeTo Joanna McCoy, father]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeTypeTo Joanna McCoy Context triple: [Leonard McCoy, relativeTypeTo Joanna McCoy, father]
-
A.
relationshipToJohanna
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has with Johanna.
-
B.
relationshipToJoannaKramer
Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to Joanna Kramer.
-
C.
hasRelationshipTypeWith Alexandra Bergson
Indicates that there exists a specific type or category of relationship between an entity and Alexandra Bergson.
-
D.
relationshipTypeWith Francesca Johnson
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Francesca Johnson.
-
E.
relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c60f9c8190af948d7354aedbeb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1de19ce048190aaa3b7b73db50e2f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f17651458c8190bbfd301883e46085 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f17b58012c81909106b332db399023 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 11:02 p.m.