Triple

T24097167
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Words of Wisdom E596953 entity
Predicate containsSocialCommentary P137528 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Words of Wisdom, containsSocialCommentary, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsSocialCommentary
Context triple: [Words of Wisdom, containsSocialCommentary, true]
  • A. hasSocialCritique chosen
    Indicates that one entity (often a work, statement, or action) contains or expresses a critical evaluation of social structures, norms, or issues.
  • B. metaCommentaryOn
    Indicates that one piece of content provides commentary, reflection, or analysis about another piece of content, often discussing its form, structure, or status as a work rather than its subject matter.
  • C. commentaryOn
    Indicates that one entity provides evaluative or explanatory remarks about another entity, such as a work, event, or statement.
  • D. hasCommentaryOn
    Indicates that one entity provides commentary, explanation, or evaluative remarks about another entity.
  • E. commentaryFocus
    Indicates that an item of commentary is primarily directed toward or centered on a particular entity, topic, or aspect.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288c548048190a5c1018da1166a21 completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1dd265274819094f7f29bd8c1c071 completed April 29, 2026, 10:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f17651458c8190bbfd301883e46085 completed April 29, 2026, 3:09 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:59 p.m.