Triple
T24072629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rolls-Royce Phantom II |
E596275
|
entity |
| Predicate | periodReputation |
P154753
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one of the most luxurious cars of its time |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the most luxurious cars of its time | Statement: [Rolls-Royce Phantom II, periodReputation, one of the most luxurious cars of its time]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: periodReputation Context triple: [Rolls-Royce Phantom II, periodReputation, one of the most luxurious cars of its time]
-
A.
laterReputation
Indicates that an entity’s reputation or status at a later time is being referred to in relation to an earlier point or context.
-
B.
periodReception
Indicates a temporal relationship where one entity receives, hosts, or is associated with another during a specific time period or interval.
-
C.
managerReputation
Indicates the perceived quality, trustworthiness, and effectiveness of a manager as judged by others.
-
D.
scoringReputation
Indicates that one entity evaluates and assigns a reputation-related score to another entity based on its behavior or performance.
-
E.
tributeAssessmentReputation
Indicates the evaluation of an entity’s reputation specifically in the context of determining or justifying a tribute assessment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c3999c8190809b282a04813dec |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1db1aad248190a1d25c64cc5016eb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1764b1d4c8190b12590c6339c31c1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1785afe3c81909be28986ffe944bf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:42 p.m.