Triple

T24067719
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Forty Hall Estate E596135 entity
Predicate hasHistoricLandscape P50021 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Forty Hall Estate, hasHistoricLandscape, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricLandscape
Context triple: [Forty Hall Estate, hasHistoricLandscape, yes]
  • A. hasLandscapeUseHistory
    Indicates that an entity has an associated record or account of how its landscape has been used or managed over time.
  • B. hasHistoricalLandCover chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with information about the land cover that existed in a specified area during a past time period.
  • C. hasHistoricSite
    Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a place recognized for its historical significance.
  • D. hasHistoricity
    Indicates that something possesses historical existence, significance, or authenticity, rather than being purely fictional, mythical, or timeless.
  • E. hasHistoricGround
    Indicates that one entity is located on, associated with, or includes land or grounds of historical significance related to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288c25c008190850cf447940ab181 completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1da5c57e88190ba05cc41b8fd035a completed April 29, 2026, 10:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1764b1d4c8190b12590c6339c31c1 completed April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:40 p.m.