Triple
T24063819
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Palladium |
E596030
|
entity |
| Predicate | isNobleMetal |
P108187
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Palladium, isNobleMetal, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNobleMetal Context triple: [Palladium, isNobleMetal, true]
-
A.
nobleMetal
chosen
Indicates that the subject is classified as a noble (chemically inert and corrosion-resistant) metal.
-
B.
associatedMetal
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to a particular metal, such as by composition, usage, origin, or symbolic association.
-
C.
hasNoble
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a noble title, status, or noble individual.
-
D.
typicalValueForMetals
Indicates the characteristic or commonly observed value of a given property specifically for metals.
-
E.
isPostTransitionMetalLike
Indicates that something exhibits chemical or physical properties characteristic of post-transition metals, such as relatively low melting points, softness, and mixed metallic/covalent bonding behavior.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c25c008190850cf447940ab181 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1da598dec8190a625309fd8f10f1d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1764b1d4c8190b12590c6339c31c1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:39 p.m.