Triple

T2405936
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Member States of the European Union E50275 entity
Predicate sharesLaw P39225 FINISHED
Object EU law supremacy over national law in EU competences LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: EU law supremacy over national law in EU competences | Statement: [Member States of the European Union, sharesLaw, EU law supremacy over national law in EU competences]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesLaw
Context triple: [Member States of the European Union, sharesLaw, EU law supremacy over national law in EU competences]
  • A. legalRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
  • B. featuresLaw
    Indicates that something includes, presents, or is characterized by a particular law or legal provision.
  • C. branchOfLaw
    Indicates a relationship where one legal field or discipline is a subdivision or specialized area within a broader body of law.
  • D. legalBackground
    Indicates that an entity has education, training, or experience related to law or the legal profession.
  • E. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88b0339a88190a1207333cd271cc9 completed March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abceab9ce881909ae0a2f34515c11e completed March 7, 2026, 7:07 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc5a530e8819094105aa92dfaf6b3 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abceaa42b88190a790355100fede3d completed March 7, 2026, 7:07 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:58 p.m.