Triple
T24057438
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Howard Wagner |
E595845
|
entity |
| Predicate | treatsAsExpendable |
P51669
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Willy Loman |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Willy Loman | Statement: [Howard Wagner, treatsAsExpendable, Willy Loman]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatsAsExpendable Context triple: [Howard Wagner, treatsAsExpendable, Willy Loman]
-
A.
isExpendable
Indicates that the entity can be sacrificed, discarded, or removed without causing unacceptable loss or consequence to the overall system or objective.
-
B.
canBeLostBy
Indicates that something is capable of being lost or forfeited by a particular entity.
-
C.
disposability
chosen
Indicates that one entity can be discarded, replaced, or treated as expendable in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
expendedAs
Indicates that a resource, amount, or asset is used up, spent, or consumed in the form of another specified entity or purpose.
-
E.
canBeRemovedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of eliminating, detaching, or undoing another entity or its effect.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c184b081909f1f1751fb8e299a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1da50d6108190a36bffaa475c8b93 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1764b1d4c8190b12590c6339c31c1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:35 p.m.