Triple
T24055954
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Husniya |
E595804
|
entity |
| Predicate | appearsInAuthorWork |
P59323
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Naguib Mahfouz |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Naguib Mahfouz | Statement: [Husniya, appearsInAuthorWork, Naguib Mahfouz]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appearsInAuthorWork Context triple: [Husniya, appearsInAuthorWork, Naguib Mahfouz]
-
A.
appearsInWorkByAuthorFrom
Indicates that an entity appears in a work that was created by an author originating from a specified place or country.
-
B.
authorOfWorkAppearingIn
Indicates that one entity is the creator or writer of a work that appears within another work or publication.
-
C.
appearsInPublication
Indicates that an entity is featured, mentioned, or discussed within a specific publication.
-
D.
creatorOfWorkAppearedIn
Indicates that a person is the creator (e.g., author, artist, director) of a work in which a given entity appeared.
-
E.
attestedInWorksOf
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a claim, form, or usage) is documented or evidenced within the works produced by a particular author or creator.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c184b081909f1f1751fb8e299a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d9d65e608190b22a81ae4f94daff |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1764b1d4c8190b12590c6339c31c1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:30 p.m.