Triple
T24053814
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Oracle at Delphi |
E595737
|
entity |
| Predicate | pronouncementsForm |
P154683
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ambiguous verses |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ambiguous verses | Statement: [Oracle at Delphi, pronouncementsForm, ambiguous verses]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: pronouncementsForm Context triple: [Oracle at Delphi, pronouncementsForm, ambiguous verses]
-
A.
correctPronunciation
Indicates that one entity provides the accurate or standard way to pronounce another entity (such as a word or name).
-
B.
avoidsPronunciationOf
Indicates that one entity deliberately refrains from saying or articulating the name, word, or expression associated with another entity.
-
C.
isMorePronouncedIn
Indicates that a particular feature, quality, or effect appears with greater intensity or prominence in one context, entity, or condition than in another.
-
D.
typeOfPronunciationDescribed
Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the kind or style of pronunciation associated with another entity.
-
E.
hasPronunciationInformation
Indicates that there is available information describing how something is pronounced.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c184b081909f1f1751fb8e299a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d9d4325c819080b878fe77280947 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1764b1d4c8190b12590c6339c31c1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f1785afe3c81909be28986ffe944bf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:21 p.m.