Triple

T24045445
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brown hydroboration E595505 entity
Predicate stereoselectivity P109445 FINISHED
Object syn addition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syn addition | Statement: [Brown hydroboration, stereoselectivity, syn addition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stereoselectivity
Context triple: [Brown hydroboration, stereoselectivity, syn addition]
  • A. hasStereoselectivity chosen
    Indicates that a reaction or process preferentially forms or involves one stereoisomer over others.
  • B. stereochemicalOutcome
    Indicates the specific three-dimensional spatial arrangement of atoms or groups in the product(s) that results from a chemical reaction or transformation.
  • C. isEnantiomerOf
    Indicates that two molecular entities are non-superimposable mirror images of each other, related by inversion of all chiral centers.
  • D. isChiral
    Indicates that an entity and its mirror image are not superimposable, reflecting a handedness or asymmetry in its structure.
  • E. typicalEnantiomericExcess
    Indicates the usual or characteristic enantiomeric excess value observed for a chiral substance or reaction, expressing the typical imbalance between its two enantiomers.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288c06a908190899cad4531f32c9a completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d9c9391c819095ea6232fa872d5c completed April 29, 2026, 10:13 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1764345388190a3102b62ddb729b4 completed April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 10:13 p.m.