Triple
T24042676
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 446 series EMU |
E595426
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInfrastructureCompatibility |
P48645
|
FINISHED |
| Object | electrified lines |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: electrified lines | Statement: [446 series EMU, hasInfrastructureCompatibility, electrified lines]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInfrastructureCompatibility Context triple: [446 series EMU, hasInfrastructureCompatibility, electrified lines]
-
A.
hasHardwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two hardware components or systems can operate together correctly and reliably without conflicts or incompatibilities.
-
B.
hasSoftwareCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one software system can operate correctly and effectively with another software system, without conflicts or required modifications.
-
C.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
D.
hasInfrastructureAbove
Indicates that one entity’s infrastructure is physically located above or over another entity.
-
E.
isGenerallyCompatibleWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities can typically function or coexist together without significant conflict, issues, or need for special adaptation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288c06a908190899cad4531f32c9a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d8db3b4c81908a36eace8ec136cc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1764345388190a3102b62ddb729b4 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:58 p.m.