Triple

T24036524
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GL(n,ℂ) E595246 entity
Predicate definedByPolynomialCondition P154607 FINISHED
Object det(A) ≠ 0 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: det(A) ≠ 0 | Statement: [GL(n,ℂ), definedByPolynomialCondition, det(A) ≠ 0]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definedByPolynomialCondition
Context triple: [GL(n,ℂ), definedByPolynomialCondition, det(A) ≠ 0]
  • A. appliesToPolynomialsOf
    Indicates that a rule, operation, or property is defined for and relevant to polynomials of a specified type or form.
  • B. arePolynomialsIn
    Indicates that the specified expressions are polynomials in the given variable(s) or over the given ring/field.
  • C. hasAssociatedPolynomial
    Indicates that one entity is linked to another entity that serves as its associated polynomial, typically representing or characterizing some of its properties or behavior.
  • D. isUnconditionalPolynomialTime
    Indicates that an algorithm or computation runs in polynomial time without relying on any unproven assumptions or conjectures.
  • E. conditionOnCoefficients
    Indicates that one entity’s state, validity, or behavior is determined by or contingent upon the values of certain coefficients.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288bf45f08190a1b6ed8cd0b9e86b completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d8d43884819093e9207a99ae2a70 completed April 29, 2026, 10:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1764345388190a3102b62ddb729b4 completed April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f1785afe3c81909be28986ffe944bf completed April 29, 2026, 3:17 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:56 p.m.