Triple
T2403335
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Central Sudanic languages |
E50218
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | branch of Nilo-Saharan languages |
C11567
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: branch of Nilo-Saharan languages Context triple: [Central Sudanic languages, instanceOf, branch of Nilo-Saharan languages]
-
A.
Nilotic languages branch
The Nilotic languages branch is a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, including parts of South Sudan, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Ethiopia.
-
B.
Nilo-Saharan language
A Nilo-Saharan language is a member of a proposed but controversial language family spoken primarily along the Nile and across parts of central and eastern Africa, characterized by significant internal diversity and debated genetic relationships.
-
C.
Nilotic language
A Nilotic language is a member of a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical and phonological features.
-
D.
Nilotic language
A Nilotic language is a member of a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical structures and vocabulary.
-
E.
Cushitic language
A Cushitic language is a member of a branch of the Afroasiatic language family spoken primarily in the Horn of Africa and parts of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical and phonological features distinct from other Afroasiatic branches.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b0339a88190a1207333cd271cc9 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:58 p.m.