Triple
T24013188
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Delimitation Commission of India |
E594594
|
entity |
| Predicate | decisionsSubjectToJudicialReview |
P15229
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no | Statement: [Delimitation Commission of India, decisionsSubjectToJudicialReview, no]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: decisionsSubjectToJudicialReview Context triple: [Delimitation Commission of India, decisionsSubjectToJudicialReview, no]
-
A.
judicialReviewBy
Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
-
B.
decisionsSubjectTo
chosen
Indicates that certain decisions are constrained by, dependent on, or must comply with specified conditions, approvals, or oversight.
-
C.
judicialReviewStatus
Indicates whether and how a decision, action, or law has been or can be examined, challenged, or ruled upon by a judicial authority.
-
D.
hasConstitutionalReview
Indicates that an authority or body has the power to examine and judge the conformity of laws or actions with a constitution.
-
E.
courtReview
Indicates that a court formally examines a decision, action, or case to determine its legality, correctness, or appropriateness.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288bc8f608190ac4af29f0bd1c744 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d59ee0a08190ad1e1bc2dad1dda7 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f17639d23c8190bed93434e2f9230a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:41 p.m.