Triple

T24011222
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject San Juan de la Frontera de Huamanga E594534 entity
Predicate hasHistoricalNameType P47064 FINISHED
Object colonial Spanish toponym LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: colonial Spanish toponym | Statement: [San Juan de la Frontera de Huamanga, hasHistoricalNameType, colonial Spanish toponym]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricalNameType
Context triple: [San Juan de la Frontera de Huamanga, hasHistoricalNameType, colonial Spanish toponym]
  • A. hasHistoricNameVariant
    Indicates that an entity has an alternative name that was used in a historical period or past context.
  • B. historicalNameType chosen
    Indicates that the relationship specifies the type or category of a historical name associated with an entity.
  • C. hasHistoricalNameChangeReason
    Indicates that there is a specific reason or cause associated with a change in an entity’s historical name.
  • D. hasHistoricNickname
    Indicates that an entity is known by a nickname that has historical significance or longstanding traditional use.
  • E. hasHistoricalRegionType
    Indicates that a historical region is associated with a specific type or classification of historical region.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e288bc8f608190ac4af29f0bd1c744 completed April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d59d6a2c8190860a44c056030826 completed April 29, 2026, 9:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f17639d23c8190bed93434e2f9230a completed April 29, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:41 p.m.