Triple
T23997710
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lip Lock |
E594150
|
entity |
| Predicate | comebackAlbumOf |
P69069
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Eve |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eve | Statement: [Lip Lock, comebackAlbumOf, Eve]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: comebackAlbumOf Context triple: [Lip Lock, comebackAlbumOf, Eve]
-
A.
comebackAlbumFor
chosen
Indicates that one album serves as an artist’s return or resurgence release following a period of inactivity, decline, or absence.
-
B.
isOnComebackAlbum
Indicates that an entity (such as a song or track) appears on an album that marks a return or resurgence for the artist after a period of reduced activity or absence.
-
C.
comebackSingleFor
Indicates that a particular single serves as a comeback release for an artist or group, marking their return after a hiatus or previous work.
-
D.
madeComeback
Indicates that an entity returned to a previous level of success, performance, or prominence after a period of decline, absence, or setback.
-
E.
reunionAlbumOf
Indicates that one entity is an album created to mark or result from the reunion of the other entity, typically a band or musical group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e288b9ecf08190b8c94a278f5674fe |
completed | April 17, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d39066f8819096d13bfdd0a047fc |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1615994c48190a5de95d3f7e5cd0a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:38 p.m.