Triple
T2397500
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Q source (hypothetical) |
E47684
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposedToExplain |
P13994
|
FINISHED |
| Object | material common to Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: material common to Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark | Statement: [Q source (hypothetical), proposedToExplain, material common to Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedToExplain Context triple: [Q source (hypothetical), proposedToExplain, material common to Matthew and Luke but absent from Mark]
-
A.
usedToExplain
Indicates that one entity serves as an explanation or clarification for another entity.
-
B.
aimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity intends to clarify, make understandable, or provide an explanation about another entity, concept, or situation.
-
C.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
D.
claimsToExplain
Indicates that one entity asserts it can provide a clarification, account, or understanding of another entity or phenomenon.
-
E.
proposedInContextOf
chosen
Indicates that something (such as an idea, action, or change) was proposed specifically within, and in relation to, a particular situation, setting, or surrounding circumstances.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1c450c81909f61abb8b6863885 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc8c5f0948190b4ea729693d8c306 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5a3825c81909ec6111dfc165453 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:57 p.m.