Triple

T23973994
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2009–2010 Chilean presidential election E604311 entity
Predicate winningCoalition P106387 FINISHED
Object Coalition for Change NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Coalition for Change | Statement: [2009–2010 Chilean presidential election, winningCoalition, Coalition for Change]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: winningCoalition
Context triple: [2009–2010 Chilean presidential election, winningCoalition, Coalition for Change]
  • A. winnerCoalition chosen
    Indicates that the referenced group of entities forms a coalition that wins or successfully prevails in a given decision, contest, or game.
  • B. majorPartyInWinningCoalition
    Indicates that a major political party is a member of the coalition that successfully forms the governing majority or wins the election.
  • C. dominantCoalition
    Indicates that a particular group or alliance holds primary power or control over decision-making within a larger organization or system.
  • D. loserCoalition
    Indicates a coalition of entities that collectively fail to win or achieve a desired outcome in a competitive or decision-making context.
  • E. largestCoalition
    Indicates that a given coalition is the largest (by size or defined measure) among all possible coalitions in the relevant context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e29543019c8190872462e593cc50b4 completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d1dda91c8190af716bceb3225aee completed April 29, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f161578d54819084a8b35496299993 completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:26 p.m.