Triple

T23969263
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Florence Johnston E604181 entity
Predicate hasSpinOffAttempt P154071 FINISHED
Object Checking In NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Checking In | Statement: [Florence Johnston, hasSpinOffAttempt, Checking In]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSpinOffAttempt
Context triple: [Florence Johnston, hasSpinOffAttempt, Checking In]
  • A. hasSpinOff
    Indicates that one entity is a derivative or spin-off product, work, or organization that originated from another entity.
  • B. hasSpinOffPotential
    Indicates that an entity (such as a project, product, or idea) has the capacity to be developed into a separate, independent venture or derivative offering.
  • C. hasSpinOffFormatElement
    Indicates that one format element is derived as a spin-off or offshoot from another format element.
  • D. hasFranchiseOrSpinOff
    Indicates that one work, series, or product is related to another as a franchise entry or a spin-off derived from it.
  • E. spinOff
    Indicates that a new entity is created by separating or divesting part of an existing entity, forming an independent offshoot derived from the original.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e29543019c8190872462e593cc50b4 completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d1da2ab08190bfe653fb5a9f2c96 completed April 29, 2026, 9:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f161578d54819084a8b35496299993 completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f167dca3608190ace9d2eef56b2af6 completed April 29, 2026, 2:07 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:25 p.m.