Triple
T23959054
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UK Consolidated Fund |
E603873
|
entity |
| Predicate | expenditureAuthorizedBy |
P115980
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Act of Parliament |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Act of Parliament | Statement: [UK Consolidated Fund, expenditureAuthorizedBy, Act of Parliament]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: expenditureAuthorizedBy Context triple: [UK Consolidated Fund, expenditureAuthorizedBy, Act of Parliament]
-
A.
authorizedSpending
Indicates that an entity has been granted permission to spend or allocate a specified amount of resources, typically funds, under defined conditions.
-
B.
hasBudgetaryAuthorityFrom
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses formal power or permission, granted by another entity, to make or control budgetary or financial allocation decisions.
-
C.
authorizedBudget
Indicates that a specified budget amount has been formally approved for use by or for a particular entity or purpose.
-
D.
overseesSpendingOf
Indicates that one entity has authority to monitor, direct, or control how another entity’s funds or budget are used.
-
E.
budgetaryAuthorityWith
Indicates that one entity has formal control or decision-making power over the allocation and use of another entity’s financial resources.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2954222288190a7323554d0cca8d7 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1d0d91cd481908f53ce7ee569c0f9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1615518088190a206f54e2fdb14a3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:22 p.m.