Triple
T23956570
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Luli |
E603806
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | variety of Paama language |
C48709
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: variety of Paama language Context triple: [Luli, instanceOf, variety of Paama language]
-
A.
variety of Kunama language
A variety of Kunama language is a distinct regional or social form of the Kunama language characterized by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features within the broader Kunama-speaking community.
-
B.
variety of the Uma language
A variety of the Uma language is a distinct regional or social form of Uma characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar while remaining mutually intelligible with other forms.
-
C.
Pame language
Pame language is a group of closely related Oto-Manguean indigenous languages spoken by the Pame people in the central highlands of Mexico, primarily in the state of San Luis Potosí.
-
D.
regional variety of Pamona language
A regional variety of the Pamona language is a geographically distinct form of Pamona characterized by systematic differences in pronunciation, vocabulary, and sometimes grammar, while remaining mutually intelligible with other Pamona varieties.
-
E.
Yana language variety
Yana language variety refers to any of the related but distinct forms of the Yana language traditionally spoken by the Yana people of northern California, encompassing dialectal differences in phonology, vocabulary, and grammar.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2954222288190a7323554d0cca8d7 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:22 p.m.