Triple

T23953775
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yamabe problem E603721 entity
Predicate hasInvariantAssociated P29145 FINISHED
Object Yamabe constant NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yamabe constant | Statement: [Yamabe problem, hasInvariantAssociated, Yamabe constant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInvariantAssociated
Context triple: [Yamabe problem, hasInvariantAssociated, Yamabe constant]
  • A. invariantOf chosen
    Indicates that one element is an invariant (a property or quantity that remains unchanged) with respect to another element, system, or transformation.
  • B. invariantType
    Indicates that one entity has a type or classification that remains constant or unchanged under specified conditions or transformations.
  • C. hasIncidence
    Indicates that a particular event, condition, or phenomenon occurs at a certain rate, frequency, or number of cases within a defined population or context.
  • D. invariantSet
    Indicates that a set remains unchanged under a specified transformation, operation, or dynamic process.
  • E. hasAssociatedPhenomenon
    Indicates that one entity is linked to, or typically occurs together with, a particular phenomenon or observable event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2954222288190a7323554d0cca8d7 completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1d0d558748190a51b5732a3e6713c completed April 29, 2026, 9:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1615518088190a206f54e2fdb14a3 completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:21 p.m.