Triple
T2394149
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Riemann zeta function |
E47609
|
entity |
| Predicate | completedZetaSymmetry |
P33072
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ξ(s) = ξ(1-s) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ξ(s) = ξ(1-s) | Statement: [Riemann zeta function, completedZetaSymmetry, ξ(s) = ξ(1-s)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: completedZetaSymmetry Context triple: [Riemann zeta function, completedZetaSymmetry, ξ(s) = ξ(1-s)]
-
A.
testsSymmetry
chosen
Indicates that one entity evaluates or verifies whether a relationship or property holds identically in both directions between two entities.
-
B.
afterSymmetryBreakingGives
Indicates that one entity or state results from another specifically after a symmetry-breaking process has occurred.
-
C.
usesSymmetryGroup
Indicates that one entity employs or is based on a particular symmetry group in its structure, behavior, or formulation.
-
D.
localSymmetry
Indicates that an entity exhibits symmetry within a localized region or subset of its structure, rather than across its entire extent.
-
E.
isSymmetricAbout
Indicates that one entity is a mirror image of another with respect to a specified axis, point, or plane of symmetry.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1c450c81909f61abb8b6863885 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc87827d88190bb2351a688e6de32 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5a3825c81909ec6111dfc165453 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:57 p.m.