Triple
T23941069
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Martin-Quinn scores |
E602784
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial ideology measure |
C48238
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: judicial ideology measure Context triple: [Martin-Quinn scores, instanceOf, judicial ideology measure]
-
A.
judicial ideal
A judicial ideal is a conceptual standard of fairness, impartiality, and justice that guides how legal decisions ought to be made and how courts should function in society.
-
B.
judicial faction
A judicial faction is a group of judges or legal decision-makers within a court system who share similar interpretive philosophies, policy preferences, or ideological leanings that influence their collective rulings and legal strategies.
-
C.
judicial network
A judicial network is a structured system of interconnected courts, judges, and legal institutions that interact through case decisions, precedents, and administrative relationships to shape and apply the law.
-
D.
merit-based judicial selection system
A merit-based judicial selection system is a method of choosing judges through an independent, criteria-driven evaluation of candidates’ qualifications and professional competence, often involving nominating commissions rather than direct elections or purely political appointments.
-
E.
judiciary
The judiciary is the branch of government responsible for interpreting laws, resolving disputes, and ensuring justice is administered fairly and in accordance with the constitution and legal principles.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953cf6e081909b8e25a10a52dddc |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:09 p.m.