Triple
T23935102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Turtmanntal |
E602611
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAlpinePasture |
P154416
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Turtmannalp |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Turtmannalp | Statement: [Turtmanntal, hasAlpinePasture, Turtmannalp]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAlpinePasture Context triple: [Turtmanntal, hasAlpinePasture, Turtmannalp]
-
A.
hasAlpineTundra
Indicates that something possesses or is characterized by an alpine tundra environment or habitat.
-
B.
hasPastoralArea
Indicates that one entity is assigned to, responsible for, or associated with a specific pastoral area or pastoral care region of another entity.
-
C.
hasAlpineFlora
Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by plant life typical of high-altitude alpine environments.
-
D.
hasPastoralStructure
Indicates that an entity possesses or is organized according to a pastoral (shepherding or ministerial) governance or structural arrangement.
-
E.
hasPastoralPlanFor
Indicates that an entity has established or adopted a pastoral plan specifically directed toward another entity or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2953cf6e081909b8e25a10a52dddc |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1cf9e8abc8190a3028a358265912e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f16151ebdc819086e9e1d7cc1f4f3c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f16e348b548190b76e50f9b611f76d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 2:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 9:01 p.m.