Triple

T23933527
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Klebanov–Tseytlin background E602565 entity
Predicate internalGeometry P25627 FINISHED
Object conifold LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conifold | Statement: [Klebanov–Tseytlin background, internalGeometry, conifold]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: internalGeometry
Context triple: [Klebanov–Tseytlin background, internalGeometry, conifold]
  • A. storesGeometryIn
    Indicates that one entity holds or contains the geometric representation or spatial data of another entity.
  • B. hasGeometry chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific geometric representation or spatial form.
  • C. viewGeometry
    Indicates a relationship where a particular viewpoint or camera setup defines how a scene’s geometry is projected, framed, or visually represented.
  • D. internalStructure
    Indicates that one entity is a component, part, or substructure contained within the overall structure of another entity.
  • E. testGeometry
    Indicates that an entity is involved in evaluating, validating, or analyzing geometric properties, shapes, or spatial relationships.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2953cf6e081909b8e25a10a52dddc completed April 17, 2026, 8:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1cf9da9c4819085880c6ad521d7ed completed April 29, 2026, 9:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f16151ebdc819086e9e1d7cc1f4f3c completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:59 p.m.