Triple
T23906346
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Unknown |
E601206
|
entity |
| Predicate | originallyThoughtLost |
P154035
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [The Unknown, originallyThoughtLost, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originallyThoughtLost Context triple: [The Unknown, originallyThoughtLost, yes]
-
A.
lostIn
Indicates that an entity has become unable to find its way or is no longer in control or possession within a particular place, situation, or context.
-
B.
lostTo
Indicates that one entity was defeated by another in a competition, conflict, or comparison.
-
C.
lostAt
Indicates that an entity ceased to be in possession of or unable to be found at a specific location or context.
-
D.
originallyHad
Indicates that an entity previously possessed, contained, or was associated with something before a change, loss, or transformation occurred.
-
E.
lostWith
Indicates that one entity experienced a loss or defeat in conjunction with, or as part of the same side/team as, another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e295364a488190bcac702e9bb7f764 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1ce91144c8190b894e25a45dfd7c9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1614e24b48190a1c8fb5b7c75ee0f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f167dca3608190ace9d2eef56b2af6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 2:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:35 p.m.