Triple

T2390452
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject lawrencium E48928 entity
Predicate hasOxidationState P19722 FINISHED
Object +3 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: +3 | Statement: [lawrencium, hasOxidationState, +3]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOxidationState
Context triple: [lawrencium, hasOxidationState, +3]
  • A. oxidationStates chosen
    Indicates the specific oxidation numbers assigned to an element or atom within a chemical species, reflecting its electron loss or gain state in that context.
  • B. predominantOxidationStateInSolution
    Indicates the oxidation state that a chemical species most commonly or primarily adopts when present in a given solution.
  • C. hasIonizationState
    Indicates the specific ionization state or charge level that an entity (such as an atom or molecule) possesses.
  • D. hasAtomicNumber
    Indicates that one entity is the chemical element whose atomic number (number of protons in its nucleus) is given by the other entity.
  • E. hasChemicalFormula
    Indicates that one entity (typically a chemical substance) is characterized by or associated with a specific chemical formula representing its elemental composition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa5f63081908d07fd302029fcbd completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc87457388190822d5506327db8f2 completed March 7, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc5a1b5748190b4cd8989700f4dd2 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:57 p.m.