Triple
T2388362
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Princes in the Tower murders |
E48883
|
entity |
| Predicate | evidenceStatus |
P16121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | no contemporary proof of the princes’ deaths |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: no contemporary proof of the princes’ deaths | Statement: [Princes in the Tower murders, evidenceStatus, no contemporary proof of the princes’ deaths]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evidenceStatus Context triple: [Princes in the Tower murders, evidenceStatus, no contemporary proof of the princes’ deaths]
-
A.
providesEvidenceFor
Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
-
B.
epistemicStatus
chosen
Indicates the degree of certainty, justification, or knowledge an agent has regarding a particular proposition or claim.
-
C.
usedEvidenceType
Indicates that a particular type or category of evidence was employed or relied upon in a given context or activity.
-
D.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
E.
authorshipEvidence
Indicates evidence or justification supporting a claim that one entity is the author or creator of another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aa5f63081908d07fd302029fcbd |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc7dca9248190b634ae9e02f6899a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5a1b5748190b4cd8989700f4dd2 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:57 p.m.