Triple

T23882552
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject A Date for Gomer E600240 entity
Predicate hasFranchiseConnection P153929 FINISHED
Object Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. | Statement: [A Date for Gomer, hasFranchiseConnection, Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C.]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFranchiseConnection
Context triple: [A Date for Gomer, hasFranchiseConnection, Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C.]
  • A. hasFranchiseRelation
    Indicates a relationship where one entity holds franchise rights or operates under the brand, business model, or authorization of another entity.
  • B. hasFranchiseRepresentation
    Indicates that one entity serves as an official franchise representative or outlet for another entity.
  • C. hasFranchiseSlot
    Indicates that an entity holds or is assigned a specific franchise position, license, or allocation within a larger franchising structure.
  • D. hasParentFranchise
    Indicates that one franchise entity is the parent or overarching franchise of another franchise entity.
  • E. hasFranchiseRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific role or position within a franchise relationship.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e295318e148190b9979d8fc02e168f completed April 17, 2026, 8:16 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1ccfaef348190b4820b6f3648c60c completed April 29, 2026, 9:18 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1614e24b48190a1c8fb5b7c75ee0f completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f167dca3608190ace9d2eef56b2af6 completed April 29, 2026, 2:07 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:24 p.m.