Triple

T23877108
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject H 111 E592897 entity
Predicate associatedKeyWorkNumbering P154293 FINISHED
Object H number LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: H number | Statement: [H 111, associatedKeyWorkNumbering, H number]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedKeyWorkNumbering
Context triple: [H 111, associatedKeyWorkNumbering, H number]
  • A. workNumbering
    Indicates that a specific numbering or cataloging identifier is assigned to a work within a larger collection or system.
  • B. associatedWorkKey
    Indicates that there is a connection or linkage between one work and another related work, typically identifying the related work by a key or identifier.
  • C. legalNumbering
    Indicates that an entity has an officially assigned legal or regulatory identification number.
  • D. workNumberingVariant
    Indicates that one work serves as an alternative or variant numbering representation of another work within a numbering or cataloging system.
  • E. categoryNumbering
    Indicates that items within a category are assigned an ordered or structured numbering scheme that defines their position or sequence in that category.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d23a5c88190ae3999c70ca15e08 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1cc02277c8190b0c15d6525f3b38d completed April 29, 2026, 9:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1614a65a88190bde1efb368a151e4 completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f16e348b548190b76e50f9b611f76d completed April 29, 2026, 2:34 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:15 p.m.