Triple
T23871172
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jean Valjean |
E592732
|
entity |
| Predicate | assumedIdentity |
P96087
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Monsieur Madeleine |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Monsieur Madeleine | Statement: [Jean Valjean, assumedIdentity, Monsieur Madeleine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assumedIdentity Context triple: [Jean Valjean, assumedIdentity, Monsieur Madeleine]
-
A.
adoptedIdentity
chosen
Indicates that one entity has taken on or assumed the identity, role, or persona of another entity, either formally or informally.
-
B.
currentIdentity
Indicates that an entity’s present or active identity is the one specified in the relationship.
-
C.
publicIdentity
Indicates that an entity’s outward-facing identity or persona is known, presented, or recognized in a public context.
-
D.
typicalIdentity
Indicates that one entity is the standard, characteristic, or most representative identity of another entity within a given context.
-
E.
promotedIdentity
Indicates that one entity has actively supported, elevated, or publicized the status, visibility, or recognition of another entity’s identity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d23a5c88190ae3999c70ca15e08 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1cbfe1f948190ad2c0d5bbe0c7240 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1614a65a88190bde1efb368a151e4 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:14 p.m.