Triple
T23871110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF RFC 6145 |
E592730
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Internet Standards Track document |
C2031
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Internet Standards Track document Context triple: [IETF RFC 6145, instanceOf, Internet Standards Track document]
-
A.
Internet standardization document
An Internet standardization document is an authoritative specification that defines technical protocols, formats, or practices to ensure interoperability and consistent behavior across the global Internet.
-
B.
IETF standard
An IETF standard is a formal, consensus-based technical specification developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force that defines protocols, formats, and best practices to ensure interoperability and reliable operation of the Internet.
-
C.
IETF document series
The IETF document series is a collection of technical publications, including RFCs and Internet-Drafts, that specify, document, and standardize protocols, procedures, and best practices for the Internet.
-
D.
IETF Request for Comments
chosen
An IETF Request for Comments (RFC) is a formal, archival document series that specifies, proposes, or discusses Internet standards, protocols, procedures, and related technical and organizational topics.
-
E.
Internet standard registry
An Internet standard registry is an authoritative, publicly maintained catalog that assigns and documents unique identifiers, parameters, and values used in Internet protocols to ensure global interoperability and consistency.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d23a5c88190ae3999c70ca15e08 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:14 p.m.