Triple

T23859577
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Countess of Fife E592404 entity
Predicate territorialPower P154216 FINISHED
Object significant LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: significant | Statement: [Countess of Fife, territorialPower, significant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: territorialPower
Context triple: [Countess of Fife, territorialPower, significant]
  • A. territorialAmbition
    Indicates a desire or intent by one entity to expand its control, ownership, or influence over additional geographic areas or territories.
  • B. mainTerritoryOfInfluence
    Indicates the primary geographic area where an entity exerts the most significant control, impact, or influence.
  • C. territorial
    Indicates that one entity claims, defends, or is associated with control over a specific area or domain in relation to another entity.
  • D. territorialLevel
    Indicates the administrative or geographic tier at which something is defined, applied, or governed within a territorial hierarchy.
  • E. hasTerritorialPossession
    Indicates that one entity holds ownership, control, or legal rights over a specific territory or geographic area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d22eb488190914b193aff952e83 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1cadebc6481909110a2a5fe85c93f completed April 29, 2026, 9:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f1614612b481908c45d99e588882f9 completed April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f16e348b548190b76e50f9b611f76d completed April 29, 2026, 2:34 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:12 p.m.