Triple
T23850162
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Americanization of the Vietnam War |
E592138
|
entity |
| Predicate | justifiedByDoctrine |
P89146
|
FINISHED |
| Object | domino theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: domino theory | Statement: [Americanization of the Vietnam War, justifiedByDoctrine, domino theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: justifiedByDoctrine Context triple: [Americanization of the Vietnam War, justifiedByDoctrine, domino theory]
-
A.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
B.
citedForDoctrine
Indicates that one entity is cited as an authoritative source or precedent for a particular doctrine, principle, or rule in relation to another entity.
-
C.
justificationUsedBy
chosen
Indicates that a particular justification is employed or relied upon by a given entity (such as a person, system, or decision).
-
D.
appliedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
-
E.
deniesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity rejects, opposes, or refuses to accept the truth or validity of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d221d908190b9b502ad31e66a3f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c986f7e08190a6d361423946ff05 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1614612b481908c45d99e588882f9 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:11 p.m.