Triple
T23837269
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AMPS firewall paradox |
E590887
|
entity |
| Predicate | motivatedDebateIn |
P137782
|
FINISHED |
| Object | quantum gravity community |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: quantum gravity community | Statement: [AMPS firewall paradox, motivatedDebateIn, quantum gravity community]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: motivatedDebateIn Context triple: [AMPS firewall paradox, motivatedDebateIn, quantum gravity community]
-
A.
goalInDebate
Indicates that one party has a specific objective or desired outcome they are trying to achieve within the context of a debate or argumentative exchange.
-
B.
canDebate
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to engage in a debate or argumentative discussion with another entity.
-
C.
settingOfDebate
chosen
Indicates the context, environment, or circumstances in which a particular debate takes place.
-
D.
inspiredPolicyDebate
Indicates that one entity’s ideas, actions, or statements sparked or significantly influenced a policy debate involving another entity.
-
E.
majorDebateWith
Indicates a significant, often public or formal, debate or dispute occurring between two entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1de32c8190a907afe9c3d6cd6d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c883c7108190b3cce6fec0b8609a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f156036ad48190bc2ffdaf39218bcb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:07 p.m.