Triple

T23837095
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Poincaré coordinates E590884 entity
Predicate hasBoundaryCoordinates P153811 FINISHED
Object x^{ mu} LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: x^{
mu} | Statement: [Poincaré coordinates, hasBoundaryCoordinates, x^{
mu}]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBoundaryCoordinates
Context triple: [Poincaré coordinates, hasBoundaryCoordinates, x^{
mu}]
  • A. hasBoundaryFeature
    Indicates that a boundary (such as an edge, border, or limit) of one entity is characterized, marked, or defined by a specific feature or element.
  • B. hasBoundaryShape
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a specific geometric or spatial shape of its boundary.
  • C. hasBoundaryIncludes
    Indicates that the spatial or conceptual boundary of one entity encompasses or contains the boundary of another entity.
  • D. hasBoundaryValues
    Indicates that one entity specifies the limiting or extreme values that define the permissible range or boundary conditions of another entity.
  • E. hasBoundaryCriterion
    Indicates that something is associated with a specific rule or condition used to define or limit its boundary.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1de32c8190a907afe9c3d6cd6d completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1c883c7108190b3cce6fec0b8609a completed April 29, 2026, 8:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f156036ad48190bc2ffdaf39218bcb completed April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f158b0e320819090b947ee7eb14116 completed April 29, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:07 p.m.