Triple
T23837061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SO(2,d-1) |
E590883
|
entity |
| Predicate | isSimpleFor |
P78092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | d+1 ≥ 5 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: d+1 ≥ 5 | Statement: [SO(2,d-1), isSimpleFor, d+1 ≥ 5]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSimpleFor Context triple: [SO(2,d-1), isSimpleFor, d+1 ≥ 5]
-
A.
isSimple
Indicates that something has a straightforward, uncomplicated nature or structure, lacking complexity or elaboration.
-
B.
isNonSimple
Indicates that the relationship or structure in question is not simple, typically meaning it has additional complexity, such as multiple components, repetitions, or self-intersections.
-
C.
isSimpleConnected
Indicates that a topological space is path-connected and every loop within it can be continuously contracted to a point (i.e., it has trivial fundamental group).
-
D.
isSingle
Indicates that an entity is not currently in a romantic relationship or legally married.
-
E.
isSimpleAsLieGroup
chosen
Indicates that a given Lie group has no nontrivial connected normal subgroups, i.e., it is simple in the sense of Lie group theory.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1de32c8190a907afe9c3d6cd6d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c883c7108190b3cce6fec0b8609a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f156036ad48190bc2ffdaf39218bcb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:07 p.m.