Triple

T23836933
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Casimir effect E590880 entity
Predicate governingConstant P153805 FINISHED
Object Planck constant NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Planck constant | Statement: [Casimir effect, governingConstant, Planck constant]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingConstant
Context triple: [Casimir effect, governingConstant, Planck constant]
  • A. governingConvention
    Indicates that one entity is the formal agreement, treaty, or convention that provides the authoritative rules or framework governing another entity or activity.
  • B. governedWith
    Indicates that two or more entities share or participate together in the act or process of governing.
  • C. governs
    Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative control, direction, or rule over another entity or domain.
  • D. governedFor
    Indicates that one entity exercised governing authority or administrative control on behalf of, or in the interest of, another entity.
  • E. governedInPartBy
    Indicates that something is subject to the authority, control, or influence of a governing entity, but only to a limited or partial extent rather than fully.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1de32c8190a907afe9c3d6cd6d completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1c882f9148190bb28fe7566ef1e70 completed April 29, 2026, 8:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f156036ad48190bc2ffdaf39218bcb completed April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f158b0e320819090b947ee7eb14116 completed April 29, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 8:07 p.m.