Triple
T23817996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mainstay |
E589147
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedAsAEW&C |
P153753
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1980s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1980s | Statement: [Mainstay, introducedAsAEW&C, 1980s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedAsAEW&C Context triple: [Mainstay, introducedAsAEW&C, 1980s]
-
A.
introducedAlongWith
Indicates that one entity was introduced or presented at the same time as another entity, as part of a joint or concurrent introduction.
-
B.
areIntroducedBy
Indicates that one entity becomes known or presented to another entity through the action or mediation of a third party or process.
-
C.
introducedAsFirst
Indicates that one entity is presented or mentioned before any others in a given context or sequence.
-
D.
introducedAsNameIn
Indicates that an entity is presented or referred to by a particular name within a specified context or source.
-
E.
introducedVia
Indicates that one entity was brought to the attention, presence, or awareness of another entity through a specific intermediary, method, or channel.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d18619081909c7fb89d8926f14a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c7ac0c688190a627b9b42c7587d5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f156036ad48190bc2ffdaf39218bcb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f158b0e320819090b947ee7eb14116 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:58 p.m.