Triple
T23807629
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Zealand Labour Party |
E589751
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStrongSupportFrom |
P153629
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trade union members |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trade union members | Statement: [New Zealand Labour Party, hasStrongSupportFrom, trade union members]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStrongSupportFrom Context triple: [New Zealand Labour Party, hasStrongSupportFrom, trade union members]
-
A.
hasSupportersIn
Indicates that an entity is backed or endorsed by people or groups located within a specified place or region.
-
B.
supportAgainst
Indicates providing help, resources, or advocacy to oppose or resist a particular target, threat, or adversary.
-
C.
supportedCouncil
Indicates that an entity provided backing, endorsement, or assistance to a council.
-
D.
supportsDecisionOf
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or agrees with the decision made by another entity.
-
E.
strongestSupportRegion
Indicates the region where an entity receives its highest level of support compared to all other regions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d19fecc8190a5cf39bbb18d5d7f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c752ff6481908cfc20d4f178d526 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155fe300481909bd617443228df65 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f15adb23d88190ac2632299c26a9b3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:56 p.m.