Triple
T23791355
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Archdiocese of La Serena |
E588096
|
entity |
| Predicate | belongsToCivilJurisdiction |
P79003
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Republic of Chile |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Republic of Chile | Statement: [Archdiocese of La Serena, belongsToCivilJurisdiction, Republic of Chile]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToCivilJurisdiction Context triple: [Archdiocese of La Serena, belongsToCivilJurisdiction, Republic of Chile]
-
A.
isWithinCivilJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates that one entity falls under the legal authority, control, or governance of a specified civil jurisdiction.
-
B.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
-
C.
associatedWithJurisdiction
Indicates that an entity has a formal or relevant connection to a particular legal or administrative jurisdiction.
-
D.
canonicalJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity holds official legal or ecclesiastical authority over another entity or domain as its recognized jurisdiction.
-
E.
typeOfJurisdiction
Indicates the specific kind or category of legal authority or control that one jurisdiction holds in relation to a given legal or administrative context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2490f4ad48190b690878eec3596c6 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c6d8215c8190af4f2dd7478e2c04 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155fe300481909bd617443228df65 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:17 p.m.