Triple
T23776361
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Legend (Deluxe Edition) |
E587685
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemastered |
P71635
|
FINISHED |
| Object | original Legend track list |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: original Legend track list | Statement: [Legend (Deluxe Edition), hasRemastered, original Legend track list]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemastered Context triple: [Legend (Deluxe Edition), hasRemastered, original Legend track list]
-
A.
hasRemasteredAppearanceIn
Indicates that an entity appears in a remastered version of a work or medium.
-
B.
hasRemastering
chosen
Indicates that one version of a work is a remastered form derived from another version of the same work.
-
C.
remasteredVersion
Indicates that one entity is a newly produced, higher-quality audio or visual version of another original recording or release.
-
D.
hasRemake
Indicates that one work is a new version or recreation of an earlier existing work.
-
E.
hasRemakeOrRetroVersion
Indicates that one work has been remade or re-released in a retro-style version of the original.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2490d245881909028226a1393d624 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c46c1ea881908dfdc305e58516db |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155f79e34819080f9ddb972b34deb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:16 p.m.