Triple
T23772996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | À l’Olympia |
E587587
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasManagerAssociated |
P3197
|
FINISHED |
| Object | René Angélil |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: René Angélil | Statement: [À l’Olympia, hasManagerAssociated, René Angélil]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasManagerAssociated Context triple: [À l’Olympia, hasManagerAssociated, René Angélil]
-
A.
associatedWithManager
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a managerial connection or relationship with a specific manager.
-
B.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
C.
hasHistoricManagerAssociation
Indicates a past managerial relationship between entities that no longer reflects the current management status.
-
D.
isManagedThrough
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or operated by means of another entity, typically specifying the mechanism, channel, or system used for its management.
-
E.
isManagedFor
Indicates that one entity is administered, overseen, or controlled on behalf of another entity or purpose.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2490d245881909028226a1393d624 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c467e6588190aab28bc5a8e43e80 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155f79e34819080f9ddb972b34deb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:15 p.m.