Triple
T23766537
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Against Noetus |
E587394
|
entity |
| Predicate | affirmsDoctrineOf |
P128384
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distinction of persons in the Godhead |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distinction of persons in the Godhead | Statement: [Against Noetus, affirmsDoctrineOf, distinction of persons in the Godhead]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affirmsDoctrineOf Context triple: [Against Noetus, affirmsDoctrineOf, distinction of persons in the Godhead]
-
A.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
-
B.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
C.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
D.
doctrinalClaim
chosen
Indicates that an entity asserts or upholds a specific doctrinal or belief-based proposition as true.
-
E.
hasDoctrinalBasis
Indicates that one concept, claim, or practice is grounded in, supported by, or derived from a specific doctrine or set of doctrines.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2490b8ac48190a6b35f1d5500486b |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1c462ad348190b51bcaf66715a950 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155f79e34819080f9ddb972b34deb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:15 p.m.