Triple
T23750698
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tom Weiskopf |
E586954
|
entity |
| Predicate | partnerInDesign |
P107860
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jay Morrish |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jay Morrish | Statement: [Tom Weiskopf, partnerInDesign, Jay Morrish]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partnerInDesign Context triple: [Tom Weiskopf, partnerInDesign, Jay Morrish]
-
A.
partnerInWorkOf
Indicates a collaborative relationship where one entity works together with another on a shared task, project, or professional activity.
-
B.
designerCollaboratedWith
chosen
Indicates that a designer worked together with another party on a shared project or creative endeavor.
-
C.
partnerInProductionCompanyWith
Indicates that two entities are business partners together in operating or owning the same production company.
-
D.
partnerInArtWorldWith
Indicates that two entities collaborate or are closely associated as partners within the art world context, such as in creation, curation, representation, or promotion of art.
-
E.
partnerInCreation
Indicates that two or more entities collaborated as partners in bringing something into existence or producing it.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2490a0eec81908cdef8a862828d7a |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1bcc1d4e8819099d3b4136f28f0c6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155f012808190a4b1cbc155558ade |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:13 p.m.