Triple
T23745079
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hirzebruch surfaces |
E586791
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | complex algebraic surface |
C41460
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: complex algebraic surface Context triple: [Hirzebruch surfaces, instanceOf, complex algebraic surface]
-
A.
complex surface
chosen
A complex surface is a two-dimensional complex manifold (equivalently, a four-dimensional real manifold) equipped with a holomorphic structure, often studied via its complex-analytic, algebraic, and topological properties.
-
B.
algebraic variety
An algebraic variety is a geometric object defined as the set of common solutions to a system of polynomial equations over a field, studied up to algebraic and topological properties.
-
C.
area of algebraic geometry
An area of algebraic geometry is a subfield focused on a specific collection of problems, techniques, and structures related to the study of solutions to polynomial equations and their geometric properties.
-
D.
divisor in algebraic geometry
A divisor in algebraic geometry is a formal finite integer linear combination of irreducible codimension-one subvarieties (or points on a curve), used to encode zeros and poles of rational functions and to study line bundles and linear systems.
-
E.
work in algebraic geometry
Work in algebraic geometry studies geometric objects defined as solution sets to polynomial equations, using tools from commutative algebra and topology to understand their structure, classification, and morphisms between them.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24908efb08190bf755c3a9b91f222 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:12 p.m.