Triple
T23738058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Year of the Rat |
E586589
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeCombinedWithElement |
P142693
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wood |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wood | Statement: [Year of the Rat, canBeCombinedWithElement, Wood]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeCombinedWithElement Context triple: [Year of the Rat, canBeCombinedWithElement, Wood]
-
A.
possibleElement
Indicates that something can potentially be a member, component, or constituent part of another entity or set, without asserting that it actually is.
-
B.
canBeAddedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
-
C.
canMerge
Indicates that two or more entities are compatible in such a way that they can be combined into a single unified entity or structure.
-
D.
canBeAugmentedWith
Indicates that one entity is capable of being enhanced, expanded, or supplemented by another entity.
-
E.
usesElementsOf
Indicates that one entity incorporates, applies, or draws upon components, principles, or features derived from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24907dc9c8190be074c9c96a0ec2d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1bad356c88190ae29ce403145ee73 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155f012808190a4b1cbc155558ade |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:11 p.m.