Triple
T23735782
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regan v. Wald |
E586536
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConstitutionalProvisionAtIssue |
P75248
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fifth Amendment |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fifth Amendment | Statement: [Regan v. Wald, hasConstitutionalProvisionAtIssue, Fifth Amendment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConstitutionalProvisionAtIssue Context triple: [Regan v. Wald, hasConstitutionalProvisionAtIssue, Fifth Amendment]
-
A.
constitutionalProvisionNotAtIssue
Indicates that a particular constitutional provision is acknowledged in the case context but is not being challenged, interpreted, or directly decided upon as part of the legal issue.
-
B.
associatedWithConstitutionalProvision
Indicates that something has a connection or relevance to a specific constitutional provision, such as being based on, derived from, or governed by that provision.
-
C.
hasConstitutionalBasisIn
Indicates that something derives its legal authority, justification, or foundation from a specific constitutional provision or framework.
-
D.
constitutionalProvisionFor
Indicates that one entity is formally established, authorized, or regulated by a specific provision within a constitution.
-
E.
citesConstitutionalProvision
chosen
Indicates that one legal document, decision, or argument explicitly references and relies on a specific provision of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24907dc9c8190be074c9c96a0ec2d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1bad07bd08190b04d7a4c8732a856 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 8:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155f012808190a4b1cbc155558ade |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:10 p.m.