Triple
T23723060
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Enochian magic |
E586195
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimedOriginOfLanguage |
P153713
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Adam |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Adam | Statement: [Enochian magic, claimedOriginOfLanguage, Adam]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimedOriginOfLanguage Context triple: [Enochian magic, claimedOriginOfLanguage, Adam]
-
A.
hasLanguageOfOrigin
Indicates that one entity has its origin or source in the language specified by another entity.
-
B.
hasLinguisticHeritage
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with the linguistic background, tradition, or ancestry of another entity.
-
C.
languageOfCoinedTerm
Indicates the language in which a particular term was originally coined or first formulated.
-
D.
claimsAboutLanguage
Indicates that one entity makes statements or assertions regarding the properties, use, status, or characteristics of a language.
-
E.
languageAttestedIn
Indicates that evidence exists showing the use or presence of a particular language in a specified place, time, or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24906fb108190a6898751e46bdc11 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b912a7548190afcfa03dd9adc47e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155e4b1148190836ede4741dcb888 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f15b453da88190889a8d9b21727958 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 7:05 p.m.